🔗 Share this article

Long-standing racial prejudice has come back within British the political arena, and it makes people feel fearful, the Prime Minister warned, alerting how divisive far-right politics was “dividing the nation”.

Addressing Racist Rhetoric and Harmful Strategies

In conversation with GP and TV personality Amir Khan, Starmer accused the Reform UK party of overseeing the revival to racist and divisive politics that seemed a thing of the past long ago”.

During the discussion, which aired on ITV’s Lorraine show this week, the PM provided his strongest signal suggesting the two-child benefit cap could be removed in the budget later this month.

Promise to Combat Poverty Among Children

When questioned whether he planned to eliminate this restriction, as noted by advocacy groups is the biggest driver of poverty for children across Britain, Starmer responded: “Let me be perfectly clear I am committed to lower poverty rates for kids.”

He outlined measures ministers have already introduced including free school meals, morning meal programs, and childcare but added: “We need to do more than that, and I pledge that I will personally focus to driving down childhood poverty.”

When pressed about if his comments indicated he would lift the two-child limit, he stated “I would not say we aim to lower poverty among children if I wasn’t clear that we will implement a number of measures in order to do so”.

Clear Signals from Rachel Reeves

Rachel Reeves, gave a similarly clear signal earlier this week when she told a national radio station how “in the end, children must not be punished if their parents are struggling financially”.

Ministers are reportedly planning to lift the limit entirely, having originally looked at phasing it out either for very large families or wealthier families. An economic thinktank has estimated this would cost about £3.5bn in the coming years.

Political Divide and Country’s Revival

In the interview, the Prime Minister said the ideological split currently in Britain existed between Labour’s “patriotic national renewal” versus Reform’s harmful divisiveness and others on the right who were “dividing the nation”.

“Certain language being used – discriminatory talk, divisive rhetoric – that frankly I thought had been addressed decades ago has reemerged in political debate and citizens are deeply afraid,” he said.

“It is essential to oppose such discrimination, that division, and declare confidently that British identity is to have concern for others, is about being fair, entails tolerance and compassionate, which we value deeply.”

Reflecting Concerns from Wes Streeting

The prime minister echoed language expressed by Wes Streeting, who warned earlier this month how an “ugly” racism reminiscent of past decades had become alarmingly frequent again with NHS staff were primary targets of this trend.

The health secretary noted occurrences of both verbal and physical attacks based on people’s skin colour had become so frequent making it “tolerated to hold racist views”.

“We must end on racism in this country and we’ve got to put such harmful attitudes that has emerged nationally where it belongs and once again create a climate across Britain that rejects racism to be racist,” Streeting stated.

Defining Choice for the Public

The Prime Minister used his speech at the Labour party conference this autumn to draw political battle lines between himself and Farage, stating that the public faced a pivotal moment.

He said he was involved in a “fight for the soul of our country”, and argued that while voters expressed valid worries regarding unauthorized immigration, there was an ethical boundary which some politicians had overstepped.

The PM pledged to “fight” those claiming that non-white individuals could not be English or British and that families who had lived in the UK for generations must be removed, saying those advocating these ideas constituted “opposed to the country’s progress”.

“If you incite racial attacks and hostility, that is not expressing concern: it’s criminal. Our political movement values national symbols, but if they are displayed with hateful messages, targeting a business owner to leave the country, that is not patriotism; that is pure discrimination,” he informed activists.